Projects Missing Indigenous Peoples (PS7) Analysis

The database assembled by NomoGaia analyzing public data regarding IFC’s potential impact on indigenous peoples is available on this page, both as a downloadable file and through the search function below.

Search:
Total Records Found: 391, showing 10 per page
Project NameProject NumberCountryCategoryNature of Indigenous Risk
Yaramoko Roxgold 36754 Burkina Faso A Burkina has indigenous peoples - but IFC project summaries make no mention of indigenous peoples at all
Xiang Niang II 42401 China B Operations at the Khorgos border crossing - Xinjiang
Xiang Niang II 42401 China B Operations at the Khorgos border crossing - Xinjiang
Vento Brasil 33642 Brazil A The client screening process to avoid "legally protected" IP lands makes PS7 "inapplicable" but IFC PS7 covers peoples who lack legal protections
SECI Mahindra 42683 India B 47 percent of pop is SC or ST. Land acquisition ignored indigeneity of landless 'sharecroppers'. Water resources and mobility could be affected - this is the 3rd solar farm in the area https://bit.ly/3eedXI3
Proteak Exp 38754 Mexico B IFC mentions the displacement of “landless workers" from forestlands but does not evaluate why they are landless or what their heritage is. IPs in Veracruz - Tabasco - Chiapas have forest links
Noble-COFCO 34738 World Region A 5 times in 2015-2018 IFC unsuccessfully required COFCO to source materials with "respect" of IPs. COFCO's Brazil (sugarcane and soy) Paraguay - Argentina - India operations affect IPs. IPs are not mentioned even as potential impacts on “ecologically sen
Nidera-COFCO 34737 World Region A 5 times 4 (2015-2018) IFC unsuccessfully required COFCO to source materials with "respect" of IPs. COFCO's Brazil (sugarcane and soy) Paraguay - Argentina - India operations affect IPs. IPs are not mentioned even as potential impacts on “ecologically se
MCS Property 31669 Mongolia B Local populations say there are IPs at the Kuhaa Khudag (UHG) mine site. https://bit.ly/2RlEudz
Hassan Allam I 37831 Egypt A IFC never explains how it decided PS7 was inapplicable when investing in a construction firm whose projects are unknown

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.